{
 "as_of": "2026-07-21T23:25:25.923170",
 "condition": "LLM alone: claude-haiku-4-5 with the complete benchmark corpus pasted as long context; no PortMem retrieval (track B of the original harness, run standalone)",
 "harness": "test_scotus_vs_llm",
 "n": 100,
 "track_b": {
  "currency_correct": 0.96
 },
 "wall_s": 91.7,
 "rows": [
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_000",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No. Plessy v. Ferguson is not good law. It was overruled by Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954). Brown held that segregation of white and Negro children in public schools solely on the basis of race denies equal protection of the law, directly overturning Plessy's \"separate but equal\" doctrine.",
    "input_tokens": 44482,
    "output_tokens": 87
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Plessy v. Ferguson was overruled by Brown v. Boa"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_001",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No. Bowers v. Hardwick is not good law. It was overruled by Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003). Lawrence overturned Bowers's holding that criminalized sodomy and affirmed a constitutional right to intimate consensual sexual conduct.",
    "input_tokens": 44483,
    "output_tokens": 70
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Bowers v. Hardwick is no longer good law and nam"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_002",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No. Adkins v. Children's Hospital is not good law. It was overruled by West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish, 300 U.S. 379 (1937).",
    "input_tokens": 44483,
    "output_tokens": 50
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Adkins v. Children's Hospital is not good law an"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_003",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No, Hammer v. Dagenhart is not good law. It was overruled by United States v. Darby, 312 U.S. 100 (1941). According to the documents, Hammer v. Dagenhart held certain restrictions on federal commerce power, but Darby reversed that precedent.",
    "input_tokens": 44483,
    "output_tokens": 76
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Hammer v. Dagenhart is no longer good law and sp"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_004",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No, Minersville School District v. Gobitis is no longer good law. It was overruled by West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943), decided just three years later. Barnette reversed Gobitis on the question of whether students could be compelled to participate in the Pledge of Allegiance, establishing that such compulsion violates the First Amendment.",
    "input_tokens": 44485,
    "output_tokens": 98
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Minersville School District v. Gobitis is no lon"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_005",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No, Breedlove v. Suttles is not good law. It was overruled by Harper v. Virginia Bd. of Elections, 383 U.S. 663 (1966). Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections struck down poll taxes as violating the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, thus overruling Breedlove's approval of Georgia's poll tax scheme.",
    "input_tokens": 44486,
    "output_tokens": 95
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Breedlove v. Suttles is not good law and explici"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_006",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "Colegrove v. Green is not good law. It was overruled by Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962). Baker v. Carr held that apportionment challenges are justiciable, overturning Colegrove's holding that such matters were political questions beyond judicial review.",
    "input_tokens": 44482,
    "output_tokens": 77
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Colegrove v. Green was overruled by Baker v. Car"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_008",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No, Wolf v. Colorado is not good law. It was overruled by Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961). Mapp overturned Wolf's holding that the exclusionary rule did not apply to the states, making the exclusionary rule applicable to state prosecutions through the Fourteenth Amendment.",
    "input_tokens": 44479,
    "output_tokens": 79
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Wolf v. Colorado is no longer good law and expli"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_009",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "Gideon v. Wainwright (372 U.S. 335, 1963) is still good law and controlling precedent. While the documents show that Argersinger v. Hamlin (407 U.S. 25, 1972) was decided later and expanded upon Gideon's right-to-counsel guarantee, Argersinger did not overrule or abrogate Gideon. Rather, Argersinger extended Gideon's principles to additional criminal proceedings. Gideon remains the foundational precedent establishing the Sixth Amendment right to counsel in criminal cases.",
    "input_tokens": 44485,
    "output_tokens": 140
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 0,
    "anchor_leak": 1,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=0  anchor_leak=1\n\n**Explanation:**\n\n- **currency_correct=0**: The answer states that Gideon \"is still g"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_010",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No, Swift v. Tyson is not good law and is no longer controlling precedent. It was overruled by Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938).",
    "input_tokens": 44481,
    "output_tokens": 54
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Swift v. Tyson is no longer good law and explici"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_011",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No. National League of Cities v. Usery (426 U.S. 833, 1976) is no longer good law. It was overruled by Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority (469 U.S. 528, 1985). Garcia reversed Usery's holding that the Tenth Amendment prohibits the federal government from applying the Fair Labor Standards Act to state and local governments.",
    "input_tokens": 44484,
    "output_tokens": 92
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that National League of Cities v. Usery is no longer "
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_012",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "United States v. Scott is **no longer good law**. It was overruled by **Smalis v. Pennsylvania**, 476 U.S. 140 (1986).",
    "input_tokens": 44480,
    "output_tokens": 44
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that United States v. Scott was overruled and specifi"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_013",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "# Illinois v. Gates Status\n\nBased on the documents provided, **Illinois v. Gates (462 U.S. 213, 1983) is still good law**. The documents show that Illinois v. Gates overruled prior cases (Aguilar v. Texas and Spinelli v. United States), but there is no document indicating that Illinois v. Gates itself has been overruled by any subsequent Supreme Court decision.",
    "input_tokens": 44479,
    "output_tokens": 95
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 0,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=0  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Illinois v. Gates overruled Aguilar v. Texas, bu"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_014",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "Based on the documents provided, I cannot definitively determine whether Payne v. Tennessee remains good law. While the documents show that Payne v. Tennessee (501 U.S. 808, 1991) overruled prior cases (Booth v. Maryland and South Carolina v. Gathers), there is no document showing that Payne itself has been overruled or abrogated by a subsequent Supreme Court decision.",
    "input_tokens": 44481,
    "output_tokens": 96
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 0,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=0  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly states that Payne v. Tennessee overruled Booth v. Maryland, demo"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_015",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "Based on the documents provided, I can only determine what happened to **Roe v. Wade**, not the current status of Planned Parenthood v. Casey itself.\n\nThe documents show that **Roe v. Wade** (1973) was overruled by **Planned Parenthood v. Casey** (1992). However, the documents do not contain information about whether Casey has subsequently been overruled, abrogated, or remains good law.\n\nTo answer your question about Casey's current status, I would need documents addressing any subsequent Supreme Court decisions that may have modified or overruled it.",
    "input_tokens": 44483,
    "output_tokens": 133
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Roe v. Wade was overruled by Planned Parenthood "
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_028",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No, Olmstead v. United States is not good law. It was overruled by Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967). Katz fundamentally changed Fourth Amendment privacy protections by establishing that the amendment protects people, not just places, and applies to electronic surveillance even without physical intrusion.",
    "input_tokens": 44482,
    "output_tokens": 80
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Olmstead is no longer good law and explicitly na"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_029",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "United States v. Ross (456 U.S. 798, 1982) is still good law and represents controlling precedent. The documents show that Ross overruled prior cases (Chimel v. California, Robbins v. California, and United States v. Rabinowitz), but I find no document indicating that Ross itself has been overruled by a subsequent Supreme Court decision.",
    "input_tokens": 44480,
    "output_tokens": 88
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 0,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=0  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Ross overruled Chimel v. California. However, th"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_031",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "Dennis v. United States is no longer good law. It was overruled by Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969). Brandenburg established a new, more speech-protective standard for evaluating incitement to illegal action under the First Amendment, superseding Dennis's approach.",
    "input_tokens": 44480,
    "output_tokens": 68
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Dennis v. United States was overruled by Branden"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_032",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire is not good law in its entirety. The case was overruled by Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15 (1971). Cohen rejected Chaplinsky's categorical approach to restricting offensive speech and established broader First Amendment protections for expressive conduct, even when the speech is vulgar or profane.",
    "input_tokens": 44482,
    "output_tokens": 81
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Chaplinsky was overruled by Cohen v. California "
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_033",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No. Beauharnais v. Illinois, 343 U.S. 250 (1952), is no longer good law. It was overruled by New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), which established stronger protections for free speech and fundamentally altered the legal standards applicable to defamatory and group libel speech.",
    "input_tokens": 44483,
    "output_tokens": 89
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Beauharnais v. Illinois is no longer good law an"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_035",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "Johnson v. Zerbst is no longer good law. It was overruled by Betts v. Brady, 316 U.S. 455 (1942), which established a different standard for the right to counsel in federal cases. However, Betts v. Brady was itself later overruled by Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963), which established that the right to counsel applies to all criminal defendants in felony cases.",
    "input_tokens": 44482,
    "output_tokens": 114
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Johnson v. Zerbst is no longer good law and spec"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_036",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No, Betts v. Brady is not good law. It was overruled by Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963). Gideon established that indigent defendants have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in criminal trials, effectively overturning Betts's holding that such counsel was only required in special circumstances.",
    "input_tokens": 44481,
    "output_tokens": 86
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Betts v. Brady was overruled by Gideon v. Wainwr"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_037",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "Escobedo v. Illinois is no longer controlling precedent. It was overruled by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), which established a more comprehensive framework for police interrogation and custodial questioning rights.",
    "input_tokens": 44482,
    "output_tokens": 59
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_038",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No. Lochner v. New York (198 U.S. 45, 1905) is no longer good law. It was overruled by West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish, 300 U.S. 379 (1937). West Coast Hotel rejected Lochner's approach to economic regulation and upheld state minimum wage laws under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.",
    "input_tokens": 44483,
    "output_tokens": 98
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Lochner is no longer good law and specifically n"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_039",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No. Dred Scott v. Sandford (60 U.S. 393, 1857) is not good law. It was effectively overruled by the Civil Rights Cases (109 U.S. 3, 1883), and its core holdings regarding citizenship and slavery were superseded by the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution.",
    "input_tokens": 44484,
    "output_tokens": 84
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Dred Scott v. Sandford is not good law and expli"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_040",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn. is still good law and controlling precedent. While the documents show that it overruled Paul v. Virginia (75 U.S. 168 (1869)), there is no indication in these materials that South-Eastern Underwriters itself has been overruled or abrogated by any subsequent Supreme Court decision.",
    "input_tokens": 44489,
    "output_tokens": 84
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Paul v. Virginia was overruled by United States "
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_044",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "# Aguilar v. Texas Status\n\n**No, Aguilar v. Texas is not good law.** It was overruled by **Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983)**.\n\nAguilar v. Texas (1964) established requirements for obtaining search warrants based on informant tips, but Illinois v. Gates replaced Aguilar's rigid two-prong test with a more flexible \"totality of the circumstances\" approach for evaluating probable cause.",
    "input_tokens": 44482,
    "output_tokens": 116
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Aguilar v. Texas was overruled by Illinois v. Ga"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_045",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "Spinelli v. United States is **not** good law. It was overruled by Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983). Illinois v. Gates replaced Spinelli's two-prong test for evaluating informant reliability with a more flexible \"totality of the circumstances\" approach for determining whether probable cause exists for a search warrant.",
    "input_tokens": 44482,
    "output_tokens": 85
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Spinelli v. United States is no longer good law "
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_046",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No, Penry v. Lynaugh is not good law. It was overruled by Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002). Atkins held that executions of mentally retarded individuals constitute cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment, effectively overturning Penry's contrary holding.",
    "input_tokens": 44484,
    "output_tokens": 82
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Penry v. Lynaugh is no longer good law and expli"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_047",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No, Stanford v. Kentucky is no longer good law. It was overruled by Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005). Stanford v. Kentucky had held that the death penalty could be imposed on juveniles who were 16 or 17 years old at the time of their crime, but Roper v. Simmons overruled that precedent and held that executing juveniles under 18 violates the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.",
    "input_tokens": 44479,
    "output_tokens": 117
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Stanford v. Kentucky is no longer good law and e"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_050",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No, Fay v. Noia is not good law. It was overruled by Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72 (1977). According to Document 31, Wainwright v. Sykes overruled the precedent established in Fay v. Noia regarding the standards for habeas corpus review and procedural defaults in federal habeas corpus proceedings.",
    "input_tokens": 44483,
    "output_tokens": 98
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Fay v. Noia is no longer good law and explicitly"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_031",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No, Paul v. Virginia is not good law. It was overruled by United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Ass'n, 322 U.S. 533 (1944). Paul v. Virginia had held that insurance was not interstate commerce, but South-Eastern Underwriters reversed that holding, establishing that the insurance business is subject to federal regulation under the Commerce Clause.",
    "input_tokens": 44479,
    "output_tokens": 89
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Paul v. Virginia is not good law and explicitly "
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_032",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "Puget Sound Stevedoring Co. v. State Tax Commission is **not** good law. It was overruled by Department of Revenue v. Washington Stevedoring Cos., 435 U.S. 734 (1978). The overruling case addressed similar commerce clause issues regarding state taxation of stevedoring activities.",
    "input_tokens": 44490,
    "output_tokens": 77
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Puget Sound Stevedoring is not good law and spec"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_033",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "Joseph v. Carter & Weekes Stevedoring Co. is **no longer good law**. It was **overruled by Department of Revenue v. Washington Stevedoring Cos.**, 435 U.S. 734 (1978).",
    "input_tokens": 44489,
    "output_tokens": 60
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_034",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "# Spector Motor Service v. O'Connor\n\n**No, Spector Motor Service v. O'Connor is no longer good law.** It was overruled by **Complete Auto Transit v. Brady**, 430 U.S. 274 (1977). \n\nThe documents show that Spector Motor Service (340 U.S. 602, 1951) addressed Commerce Clause challenges to state taxes, but Complete Auto Transit provided a new framework for analyzing such taxes that superseded Spector's precedent.",
    "input_tokens": 44485,
    "output_tokens": 119
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Spector Motor Service is no longer good law and "
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_035",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "# Joseph E. Seagram & Sons v. Hostetter Status\n\nJoseph E. Seagram & Sons v. Hostetter, 384 U.S. 35 (1966), is **no longer good law**. It was overruled by **Healy v. Beer Institute**, 491 U.S. 324 (1989).",
    "input_tokens": 44488,
    "output_tokens": 84
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Seagram & Sons v. Hostetter is no longer good la"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_036",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "Kring v. Missouri (107 U.S. 221, 1883) is **not** good law and is no longer controlling precedent. It was **overruled by Collins v. Youngblood** (497 U.S. 37, 1990).",
    "input_tokens": 44481,
    "output_tokens": 66
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Kring v. Missouri is no longer good law and expl"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_037",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "Thompson v. Utah, 170 U.S. 343 (1898), is **no longer good law**. It was overruled by Collins v. Youngblood, 497 U.S. 37 (1990).",
    "input_tokens": 44479,
    "output_tokens": 58
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_038",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No. Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co., 157 U.S. 429 (1895), is no longer good law. It was overruled by South Carolina v. Baker, 485 U.S. 505 (1988), which addressed the federal income tax exemption for interest on state bonds that Pollock had previously protected.",
    "input_tokens": 44489,
    "output_tokens": 86
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Pollock is no longer good law and names the over"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_039",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No, Hooven & Allison Co. v. Evatt is no longer good law. It was overruled by Limbach v. Hooven & Allison Co., 466 U.S. 353 (1984).",
    "input_tokens": 44489,
    "output_tokens": 59
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Hooven & Allison Co. v. Evatt is no longer good "
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_040",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No. Ex parte Bakelite Corp., 279 U.S. 438 (1929), is no longer good law. It was overruled by Glidden Co. v. Zdanok, 370 U.S. 530 (1962).",
    "input_tokens": 44483,
    "output_tokens": 65
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Ex parte Bakelite Corp. is no longer good law an"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_041",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "Williams v. United States, 289 U.S. 553 (1933), is **no longer good law**. It was overruled by Glidden Co. v. Zdanok, 370 U.S. 530 (1962).",
    "input_tokens": 44480,
    "output_tokens": 63
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Williams v. United States is no longer good law "
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_042",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "O'Callahan v. Parker is **not** good law. It was **overruled by Solorio v. United States, 483 U.S. 435 (1987)**.",
    "input_tokens": 44483,
    "output_tokens": 48
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that O'Callahan v. Parker is no longer good law and e"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_043",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "Durham v. United States (401 U.S. 481, 1971) is **not** good law. It was overruled by Dove v. United States, 423 U.S. 325 (1976). According to the Dove opinion, \"To the extent that Durham v. United States, 401 U.S. 481, may be inconsistent with this ruling, Durham is overruled.\"",
    "input_tokens": 44480,
    "output_tokens": 98
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Durham v. United States is no longer good law an"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_044",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "# Evans v. Gore Status\n\nNo, **Evans v. Gore is no longer good law**. It was **overruled by United States v. Hatter, 532 U.S. 557 (2001)**.\n\nEvans v. Gore (1920) held that federal judges' salaries were protected from federal income taxation. United States v. Hatter reversed this precedent and held that federal judges' salaries are subject to federal income tax.",
    "input_tokens": 44479,
    "output_tokens": 103
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_045",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "Miles v. Graham, 268 U.S. 501 (1925), is **not** good law and is **not** controlling precedent. It was overruled by O'Malley v. Woodrough, 307 U.S. 277 (1939). Miles v. Graham held that federal judges' salaries could be taxed, but O'Malley v. Woodrough reversed that holding.",
    "input_tokens": 44479,
    "output_tokens": 99
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Miles v. Graham is not good law and explicitly n"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_046",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "Bonelli Cattle Co. v. Arizona (414 U.S. 313, 1973) was overruled by Oregon ex rel. State Land Board v. Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co. (429 U.S. 363, 1977). Therefore, Bonelli Cattle is no longer good law.",
    "input_tokens": 44485,
    "output_tokens": 79
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Bonelli Cattle Co. v. Arizona was overruled by O"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_047",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "Based on the documents provided, **Reitz v. Mealey is no longer good law**. It was **overruled by Perez v. Campbell**, 402 U.S. 637 (1971).\n\nReitz involved a challenge to a state motor vehicle suspension, while Perez addressed whether state bankruptcy law could be preempted by federal bankruptcy discharge provisions\u2014the later case superseded Reitz's precedent on this issue.",
    "input_tokens": 44484,
    "output_tokens": 103
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Reitz v. Mealey was overruled by Perez v. Campbe"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_048",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "# Kesler v. Department of Public Safety\n\n**Kesler v. Department of Public Safety (1962) is no longer good law.** It was overruled by **Perez v. Campbell (1971)**.\n\nAccording to Document 49, Kesler addressed issues related to state financial responsibility laws for motor vehicle accidents. Perez v. Campbell (Document 49) subsequently overruled Kesler on these issues.",
    "input_tokens": 44484,
    "output_tokens": 98
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Kesler v. Department of Public Safety is no long"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_049",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "# Meek v. Pittinger Status\n\n**No, Meek v. Pittinger is no longer good law.** It was overruled by **Mitchell v. Helms, 530 U.S. 793 (2000)**.\n\nMeek v. Pittinger (1975) addressed the constitutionality of providing auxiliary services to students in nonpublic schools. Mitchell v. Helms subsequently overruled this precedent, establishing different standards for evaluating aid to religious schools.",
    "input_tokens": 44483,
    "output_tokens": 118
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Meek v. Pittinger is no longer good law and expl"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_050",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "Wolman v. Walter is not good law. It was overruled by Mitchell v. Helms, 530 U.S. 793 (2000). Mitchell v. Helms superseded Wolman's precedent regarding the constitutionality of aid to nonpublic schools.",
    "input_tokens": 44481,
    "output_tokens": 70
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Wolman v. Walter is not good law and was overrul"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_051",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "School District of City of Grand Rapids v. Ball is **no longer good law**. It was overruled by **Agostini v. Felton, 521 U.S. 203 (1997)**.",
    "input_tokens": 44485,
    "output_tokens": 53
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Ball was overruled and names the overruling case"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_052",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No, Aguilar v. Felton is no longer good law. It was overruled by Agostini v. Felton, 521 U.S. 203 (1997). The overruling case involved the same parties and addressed the same constitutional issues regarding education funding.",
    "input_tokens": 44484,
    "output_tokens": 69
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Aguilar v. Felton is no longer good law and expl"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_053",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "Whitney v. California (1927) is no longer good law. It was overruled by Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969). Brandenburg established a new standard for evaluating incitement to unlawful action under the First Amendment, replacing Whitney's approach.",
    "input_tokens": 44479,
    "output_tokens": 56
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Whitney v. California was overruled and specific"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_054",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "Valentine v. Chrestensen is **not** good law and is **not controlling precedent**. It has been overruled by Virginia State Pharmacy Board v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, 425 U.S. 748 (1976). That case rejected Valentine's categorical exclusion of commercial speech from First Amendment protection.",
    "input_tokens": 44482,
    "output_tokens": 74
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Valentine v. Chrestensen is no longer good law a"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_055",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "# Roth v. United States Status\n\n**Roth v. United States is no longer controlling precedent.** It was overruled by **Miller v. California**, 413 U.S. 15 (1973).\n\nMiller v. California established a new test for obscenity that replaced the standard articulated in Roth, modifying how courts evaluate whether material is obscene under the First Amendment.",
    "input_tokens": 44482,
    "output_tokens": 94
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_056",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No. Amalgamated Food Employees Union Local 590 v. Logan Valley Plaza, 391 U.S. 308 (1968), was overruled by Hudgens v. National Labor Relations Board, 424 U.S. 507 (1976). The documents indicate that Hudgens directly superseded Logan Valley Plaza's precedent regarding First Amendment protections in privately owned shopping centers.",
    "input_tokens": 44492,
    "output_tokens": 93
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\n**Reasoning:**\n\n- **currency_correct=1**: The answer explicitly states that the origi"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_057",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "Harris v. United States, 331 U.S. 145 (1947), is **not** good law. It was overruled by **Chimel v. California**, 395 U.S. 752 (1969), which established new Fourth Amendment standards for the permissible scope of searches incident to lawful arrest.",
    "input_tokens": 44480,
    "output_tokens": 78
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Harris v. United States is not good law and expl"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_058",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "Lustig v. United States (338 U.S. 74, 1949) is not controlling precedent and is no longer good law. It was overruled by Elkins v. United States (364 U.S. 206, 1960).",
    "input_tokens": 44482,
    "output_tokens": 63
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Lustig v. United States is no longer controlling"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_059",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "United States v. Rabinowitz is no longer good law. It was overruled by Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969). Chimel established a more restrictive standard for searches incident to lawful arrest, limiting the scope of permissible search to the person arrested and areas within the person's immediate control.",
    "input_tokens": 44483,
    "output_tokens": 82
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that United States v. Rabinowitz was overruled by Chi"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_060",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "Jones v. United States (362 U.S. 257, 1960) has been overruled. It was overruled by United States v. Salvucci (448 U.S. 83, 1980), which superseded Jones's precedent regarding standing to challenge searches.",
    "input_tokens": 44480,
    "output_tokens": 69
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Jones v. United States was overruled and specifi"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_061",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "Arkansas v. Sanders is not good law. It was overruled by California v. Acevedo, 500 U.S. 565 (1991).",
    "input_tokens": 44479,
    "output_tokens": 40
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Arkansas v. Sanders is not good law and specific"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_062",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No, Robbins v. California is not good law. It was overruled by United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798 (1982). Robbins addressed the scope of automobile searches under the Fourth Amendment, and Ross superseded its holding regarding the permissible scope of container searches within vehicles.",
    "input_tokens": 44481,
    "output_tokens": 74
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Robbins v. California was overruled by United St"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_063",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "Ex parte Bain is **not** good law and is **not** controlling precedent. It was overruled by United States v. Miller (1985), 471 U.S. 130. The documents indicate that Ex parte Bain concerned procedural issues in criminal practice that were superseded by later Supreme Court precedent.",
    "input_tokens": 44480,
    "output_tokens": 75
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Ex parte Bain is not good law and explicitly nam"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_064",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No, Brantley v. Georgia is no longer good law. It was overruled by Price v. Georgia, 398 U.S. 323 (1970). Brantley had addressed a state's power to retry an accused after a guilty verdict on a lesser included offense, but Price v. Georgia reversed that precedent on this issue.",
    "input_tokens": 44482,
    "output_tokens": 80
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Brantley v. Georgia was overruled by Price v. Ge"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_065",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No, Palko v. Connecticut is not good law. It was overruled by Benton v. Maryland, 395 U.S. 784 (1969). Benton held that the Fifth Amendment guarantee against double jeopardy is enforceable against the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, overturning Palko's framework for selective incorporation of Bill of Rights protections.",
    "input_tokens": 44481,
    "output_tokens": 90
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Palko v. Connecticut is no longer good law and e"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_066",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "Based on the documents provided, Bryan v. United States, 338 U.S. 552 (1950), is overruled by Burks v. United States, 437 U.S. 1 (1978). Therefore, Bryan v. United States is no longer good law.",
    "input_tokens": 44480,
    "output_tokens": 69
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Bryan v. United States was overruled by Burks v."
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_067",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "# Sapir v. United States Status\n\n**No, Sapir v. United States is not good law.** It was overruled by **Burks v. United States, 437 U.S. 1 (1978)**.",
    "input_tokens": 44482,
    "output_tokens": 59
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Sapir v. United States is no longer good law and"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_068",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "Yates v. United States (354 U.S. 298, 1957) is no longer good law. It was overruled by Burks v. United States (437 U.S. 1, 1978).",
    "input_tokens": 44482,
    "output_tokens": 57
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Yates v. United States is no longer good law and"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_069",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "Hoag v. New Jersey (356 U.S. 464, 1958) is **not** good law. It was overruled by **Ashe v. Swenson**, 397 U.S. 436 (1970). Ashe applied the Fifth Amendment guarantee against double jeopardy to the states and established that the issue preclusion doctrine applies to state prosecutions, which superseded Hoag's more limited approach to double jeopardy protection.",
    "input_tokens": 44482,
    "output_tokens": 111
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Hoag v. New Jersey is not good law and explicitl"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_070",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "Based on the documents provided, **Forman v. United States is no longer good law**. It was overruled by **Burks v. United States, 437 U.S. 1 (1978)**.\n\nForman involved questions of double jeopardy in a criminal conspiracy case, while Burks addressed the standard for overturning convictions when the evidence is insufficient.",
    "input_tokens": 44482,
    "output_tokens": 91
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Forman v. United States is no longer good law an"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_071",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "United States v. Jenkins, 420 U.S. 358 (1975), is **not good law**. It was overruled by **United States v. Scott, 437 U.S. 82 (1978)**.",
    "input_tokens": 44480,
    "output_tokens": 58
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Jenkins was overruled by Scott and explicitly st"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_072",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "United States v. Halper, 490 U.S. 435 (1989), is **no longer good law**. It was overruled by **Hudson v. United States, 522 U.S. 93 (1997)**.",
    "input_tokens": 44482,
    "output_tokens": 61
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that United States v. Halper is no longer good law an"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_073",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No, Grady v. Corbin is not good law. It was overruled by United States v. Dixon, 509 U.S. 688 (1993).",
    "input_tokens": 44483,
    "output_tokens": 44
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Grady v. Corbin is no longer good law and specif"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_074",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "Twining v. New Jersey is **no longer good law**. It was overruled by **Malloy v. Hogan**, 378 U.S. 1 (1964). Malloy held that the privilege against self-incrimination is enforceable against the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, directly contradicting Twining's holding that this privilege was not so incorporated.",
    "input_tokens": 44482,
    "output_tokens": 91
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Twining v. New Jersey is no longer good law and "
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_075",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "Cohen v. Hurley is **not** good law and is no longer controlling precedent. It was **overruled by Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S. 511 (1967)**.\n\nCohen v. Hurley held that the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination was not applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. Spevack v. Klein reversed this holding and extended the self-incrimination privilege to state proceedings.",
    "input_tokens": 44481,
    "output_tokens": 108
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Cohen v. Hurley was overruled and is no longer g"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_076",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No, Agins v. City of Tiburon is not good law. It was overruled by Lingle v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc., 544 U.S. 528 (2005). According to Document 77, Lingle overruled the precedent established in Agins regarding the standards for evaluating regulatory takings claims under the Fifth Amendment.",
    "input_tokens": 44486,
    "output_tokens": 92
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Agins v. City of Tiburon is not good law and exp"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_077",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "# Sinclair v. United States Status\n\nBased on the documents provided, **Sinclair v. United States (279 U.S. 263, 1929) is overruled and no longer good law**. \n\nIt was overruled by **United States v. Gaudin (515 U.S. 506, 1995)**, which established a different standard regarding materiality of false statements in federal criminal cases.\n\nOnly the original case opinion is provided in the documents; the overruling reference appears in Document 78.",
    "input_tokens": 44482,
    "output_tokens": 122
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Sinclair v. United States was overruled by Unite"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_078",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No, Walton v. Arizona is not good law. It was overruled by Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002). Ring held that the Sixth Amendment requires a jury, rather than a judge, to determine the existence of aggravating circumstances necessary to impose capital punishment.",
    "input_tokens": 44481,
    "output_tokens": 72
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Walton v. Arizona is no longer good law and expl"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_079",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No. Delli Paoli v. United States (352 U.S. 232, 1957) has been overruled by Bruton v. United States (391 U.S. 123, 1968). The documents indicate that Bruton specifically addressed and superseded Delli Paoli's precedent regarding the admissibility of a codefendant's confession in joint trials.",
    "input_tokens": 44485,
    "output_tokens": 94
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Delli Paoli was overruled by Bruton and explicit"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_080",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No, Ohio v. Roberts is not good law. It was overruled by Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004). Crawford established a new framework for evaluating the admissibility of testimonial hearsay under the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause, replacing the Ohio v. Roberts test.",
    "input_tokens": 44479,
    "output_tokens": 77
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Ohio v. Roberts is no longer good law and explic"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_081",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "# Booth v. Maryland Status\n\n**Booth v. Maryland is no longer good law.** It was overruled by **Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808 (1991)**.\n\nBooth (1987) held that victim impact statements were unconstitutional in capital sentencing proceedings. However, Payne reversed this holding and permitted the use of victim impact evidence at sentencing in death penalty cases.",
    "input_tokens": 44480,
    "output_tokens": 99
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Booth v. Maryland was overruled by Payne v. Tenn"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_082",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "# South Carolina v. Gathers Status\n\n**South Carolina v. Gathers is no longer good law.** It was overruled by **Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808 (1991)**.\n\nSouth Carolina v. Gathers, 490 U.S. 805 (1989), involved victim impact statements at the sentencing phase of a capital case. Payne v. Tennessee explicitly overruled this precedent, holding that victim impact evidence is admissible during the sentencing phase of capital murder trials.",
    "input_tokens": 44482,
    "output_tokens": 127
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that South Carolina v. Gathers is no longer good law "
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_083",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "# Ford Motor Co. v. Department of Treasury\n\nFord Motor Co. v. Department of Treasury (323 U.S. 459, 1945) is **no longer controlling precedent**. It was overruled by **Lapides v. Board of Regents of University System of Georgia** (535 U.S. 613, 2002).",
    "input_tokens": 44484,
    "output_tokens": 83
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Ford Motor Co. v. Department of Treasury is no l"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_084",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No. Parden v. Terminal Railroad Co. of Alabama Docks Department is no longer good law. It was overruled by Welch v. Texas Department of Highways & Transportation, 483 U.S. 468 (1987), which limited the scope of sovereign immunity waivers under federal statutes.",
    "input_tokens": 44490,
    "output_tokens": 74
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Parden is no longer good law and specifically na"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_085",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No. Parden v. Terminal Railroad Co. of Alabama Docks Department (377 U.S. 184, 1964) is no longer good law. It was overruled by Welch v. Texas Department of Highways & Transportation (483 U.S. 468, 1987) and College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board (527 U.S. 666, 1999).",
    "input_tokens": 44490,
    "output_tokens": 107
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Parden is no longer good law and explicitly name"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_086",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "Shapiro v. Thompson is no longer good law. It was overruled by Edelman v. Jordan, 415 U.S. 651 (1974). Edelman established different standards for Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity in suits against state officials, limiting the holding of Shapiro regarding injunctive relief in federal welfare programs.",
    "input_tokens": 44481,
    "output_tokens": 78
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Shapiro v. Thompson was overruled and names the "
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_087",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "Wyman v. Bowens is no longer good law. It was overruled by Edelman v. Jordan, 415 U.S. 651 (1974). Edelman established that federal courts cannot order states to pay retroactive welfare benefits, overturning Wyman's contrary holding.",
    "input_tokens": 44483,
    "output_tokens": 71
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Wyman v. Bowens is no longer good law and specif"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_088",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No. Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co., 491 U.S. 1 (1989), is no longer good law. It was overruled by Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida, 517 U.S. 44 (1997), which rejected Pennsylvania's holding on state sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment.",
    "input_tokens": 44482,
    "output_tokens": 79
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co. is no longer good "
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_089",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "Simpson v. Rice (395 U.S. 711, 1969) is no longer good law. It was overruled by Alabama v. Smith (490 U.S. 794, 1989).",
    "input_tokens": 44479,
    "output_tokens": 51
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Simpson v. Rice was overruled and specifically n"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_090",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "Arnett v. Kennedy, 416 U.S. 134 (1974), was overruled by Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532 (1985). Loudermill established different procedural due process requirements for government employee terminations than those set forth in Arnett.",
    "input_tokens": 44481,
    "output_tokens": 79
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Arnett v. Kennedy was overruled by Cleveland Boa"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_091",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "Parratt v. Taylor (451 U.S. 527 (1981)) is not entirely good law. It was overruled in part by Daniels v. Williams (474 U.S. 327 (1986)), which rejected Parratt's holding that mere negligence can constitute a due process violation under the Fourteenth Amendment.",
    "input_tokens": 44482,
    "output_tokens": 83
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Parratt v. Taylor was overruled (in part) by Dan"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_092",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No, Liggett Co. v. Baldridge is not good law. It was overruled by North Dakota Pharmacy Board v. Snyder's Drug Stores, 414 U.S. 156 (1973).",
    "input_tokens": 44486,
    "output_tokens": 56
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Liggett Co. v. Baldridge is no longer good law a"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_093",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "# City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health\n\n**City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health is no longer good law.** It was overruled by **Planned Parenthood v. Casey**, 505 U.S. 833 (1992).\n\nThe documents show that Casey explicitly superseded Akron's precedential status in abortion jurisprudence.",
    "input_tokens": 44490,
    "output_tokens": 96
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive H"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_094",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No. Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists is no longer good law. It was overruled by Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992).",
    "input_tokens": 44493,
    "output_tokens": 58
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Thornburgh was overruled and specifically names "
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_095",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "Quaker City Cab Co. v. Pennsylvania, 277 U.S. 389 (1928), is overruled and no longer good law. It was overruled by Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co., 410 U.S. 356 (1973).",
    "input_tokens": 44486,
    "output_tokens": 72
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Quaker City Cab Co. v. Pennsylvania was overrule"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_096",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No, Goesaert v. Cleary is not good law. It was overruled by Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190 (1976). Craig v. Boren applied heightened scrutiny to gender-based classifications, superseding Goesaert's more deferential approach to sex discrimination.",
    "input_tokens": 44485,
    "output_tokens": 81
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Goesaert v. Cleary is no longer good law and exp"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_097",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No, Morey v. Doud is not good law. It was overruled by City of New Orleans v. Dukes, 427 U.S. 297 (1976).",
    "input_tokens": 44483,
    "output_tokens": 48
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Morey v. Doud is no longer good law and explicit"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_098",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No, **Hoyt v. Florida is not good law**. It was overruled by **Taylor v. Louisiana**, 419 U.S. 522 (1975).\n\nTaylor v. Louisiana invalidated the practice upheld in Hoyt that allowed women to be excluded from jury service based on their gender.",
    "input_tokens": 44481,
    "output_tokens": 73
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Hoyt v. Florida is no longer good law and explic"
   }
  },
  {
   "pair_id": "scotus_099",
   "track_b": {
    "text": "No. Swain v. Alabama is not good law. It was overruled by Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986). Batson established a new standard for challenging discriminatory use of peremptory challenges in jury selection, replacing Swain's more restrictive approach.",
    "input_tokens": 44481,
    "output_tokens": 75
   },
   "track_b_score": {
    "currency_correct": 1,
    "anchor_leak": 0,
    "judge_text": "currency_correct=1  anchor_leak=0\n\nThe answer correctly identifies that Swain v. Alabama is not good law and explicitly "
   }
  }
 ]
}